Should “Revenge Porn” Be Illegal?




Flickr CC via luxuryluke
Advocates in Maryland are working to make distributing explicit photos and videos of other people illegal without written consent.  The law is purposed to curb the practice known as “revenge porn”. Thousands of women find every year that private pictures of them are displayed throughout the Internet by way of angry ex romantic partners.  Many of them even find profiles on pornographic websites that contain personal information, include their full names and addresses.

Currently, only Florida and California have laws against revenge porn. Critics say that it is a violation of free speech, and express concerns that it would create a liability issue for journalists that sometimes publish explicit pictures for news reasons.  The Maryland law would include an exception for journalism.

Dr. Holly Jacobs was a victim of revenge porn for three and a half years. During those years, the police and FBI continuously refused to file criminal charges against her ex on the grounds that there were technically no laws against what he was doing. After her ex’s targeted behavior forced her to change jobs, go through several email addresses, legally change her name, deactivate all of her social media accounts, cancel her attendance to professional meetings, and restrict her from publishing in her field, she became an advocate against the practice.

Jacobs is the founder of EndRevengePorn.com and says that victims of revenger porn are often blamed.  The general attitude and the way the law is written right now is a “blame the victim mentality”.

Civil rights groups such as the ACLU and the Electronic Frontier Foundation have hesitated to take an official position on the legality of revenge porn.  While the behavior is condemning, there is little indication that the laws
would curb the practice or make cyber crimes easier to prosecute.

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post