Does the NSA have the right to our phone records? Image: Shutterstock |
A ruling by U.S. District Judge Richard Leon in Washington
stated that the NSA’s surveillance of who we are calling and for how long was
likely unconstitutional. However, at the end of December, U.S. District Judge
William Pauley in New York ruled just the opposite—that the government’s bulk
collection of such data was perfectly legal.
So, what does the constitution actually protect us from?
According to legal analyst Kendall
Coffey, the government is perfectly within its rights to monitor our phone
records. We may not all be comfortable with that fact, but the truth is, it’s
been happening for a long time.
“But here’s the issue: since 1979, the U.S. Supreme Court
has said it’s pretty clear that information from your phone and to [whom]
you’re calling and how long the duration of the phone call is not confidential
or private information,” Coffey said on a
recent segment of Steve Malzberg’s Spinning
the Law.
“I understand why many of us are uncomfortable about the
fact that the government has so much information about all of us… [and] can do
so many things to collect information and analyze it,” he continues.
“But the reality is that there isn’t a constitutional
protection from those bits of information one at a time. So putting it all
together, which is what the existing capabilities allow, doesn’t turn it into a
constitutional violation.”
Following that logic, the government can freely collect
information on who we call and how long those calls last—information that used
to show up on our monthly phone bills—and analyze that information as it
pleases.
What are your thoughts on the NSA's phone surveillance?
What are your thoughts on the NSA's phone surveillance?
Post a Comment