$18.7 Billion BP Deepwater Horizon Settlement Sets Environmental Law Record

Brown pelican covered in oil from the BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico
This pelican is covered in oil from the BP Deepwater Horizon
oil spill. Photo Courtesy: Governor Jindal's Office | Flickr CC.
An explosion on the Deepwater Horizon oil rig in April 2010 left 11 people dead. It spilled an estimated 200 million gallons of oil into the Gulf of Mexico. Nearly five years later it appears that a settlement in the case has been reached. The claim is awaiting approval by the United States District Court Judge. If approved it would be the largest environmental settlement in the nation’s history.

The settlement includes the Federal Government, the states of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas, and more than 400 local governments. Communities along the Gulf coast suffered financial losses from the immediate and long-term results of the spill. Tourism losses are estimated at $22.7 billion. Total losses to the fishing industry may reach $8.7 billion. More than 5,000 marine mammals, 1,000 sea turtles, and nearly 1 million birds were killed as a result of the spill.

This settlement is in addition to $4 billion already paid in criminal fines. BP estimates that they will spend over $40 billion in costs related to the spill, including an estimated $14 billion spent during the 3-month period when the company tried to control the spill.

Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch commented on the result of the complex negotiations that lead to this agreement. She said it would, “justly and comprehensively address outstanding federal and state claims” and “bring lasting benefits to the Gulf region for generations to come.”

One round of negotiations in 2013 failed to deliver an agreement due to “unrealistic expectations” for the amounts that Alabama and Louisiana would receive. Over time, “the states became much more realistic,” said David M. Uhlmann, a professor at university of Michigan Law School and a former federal prosecutor of environmental crimes, in the New York Times.

Under the agreement, BP would pay the federal government a civil penalty of $5.5 billion under the Clean Water Act over a 15-year time frame, and would pay $7.1 billion under the Natural Resource Damage Assessment to the Gulf, which is meant to compensate for direct environmental harm caused by the spill. Economic damage claims made by the states total $6 billion—$1 billion of that amount is allocated to claims from local governments.

A further $5 billion of the settlement—in addition to $1 billion for local government claims—would arise from economic damage claims made by the states.

Robert W. Dudley, BP’s group chief executive quoted in the New York Times, called the agreement “a realistic outcome which provides clarity and certainty for all parties.”

Environmental groups’ response to the settlement is mixed. Some say it took too long. Others argue that the settlement isn’t large enough to fix the damage. However, some environmentalists are responding with cautious optimism.

The settlement puts aside $232 million to pay for long-term damages discovered after the settlement is approved. The settlement does not signal an end to the impact of the spill, but it marks a major step in the region’s environmental recovery. No one is planning to stop paying attention to the Gulf, in fact it may signal a time for increased awareness and attention.

“Let’s put it this way: I’m still going to come in to work tomorrow. I think it’s still critically important for all of us to pay attention to how this money is spent,” said Bethany Kraft, director of the Gulf Restoration Program at the Ocean Conservancy.

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post